On 2017-02-14 12:33:35 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 2/13/17 8:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2017-02-14 11:46:52 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > > I still fail to see why --use-existing as suggested in > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170208002900.vkldujzfkwbvq...@alap3.anarazel.de > > > > isn't sufficient. > > > > > > Some tests create objects without removing them, meaning that > > > continuous runs would fail with only --use-existing. This patch brings > > > value in such cases. > > > > You can trivially script the CREATE/DROP DB outside with > > --use-existing. Which seems a lot more flexible than adding more and > > more options to pg_regress. > > AFAIK if you're doing make check (as opposed to installcheck) it's > significantly more complicated than that since you'd have to create a temp > cluster/install yourself.
But in that case you can't have useful templates in the regression test either, so the whole discussion is moot? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
