Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> Thoughts, comments, objections, better ideas? > > > > No better ideas. I'm a bit concerned about declarations needed both by > > normal and xlog related routines, but I guess that can be solved by a > > third header as you did. > > Yeah, that doesn't seem bad to me. I think it's actually fairly > unfortunate that we've just shoved declarations from 3 or 4 or 5 > different source files into a single header in many of these cases. I > think it leads to not thinking clearly about what the dependencies > between the different source files in the index AM stuff is, and > certainly there seems to be some room for improvement there, > especially with regard to gist and gin.
Agreed -- on a very quick read, I like the way you split the GIN headers. I don't think the concern is really the number of source files involved, because I think in some places we're bad at splitting source files sensibly. > Sorting that out is a bigger > project than I'm prepared to undertake right now, but I think this is > probably a step in the right direction. Yes, I think so too. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
