On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Feb 25, 2017 15:00, "Michael Paquier" <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> > wrote: >> Oh, I definitely think such a command should be able to take a placeholder >> like %f telling which segment it has just processed. In fact, I'd consider >> it one of the most important features of it :) > > I cannot think about any other meaningful variables, do you? > > > Not offhand. But one thing that could go to the question of parameter name - > what if we finish something that's not a segment. During a time line switch > for example, we also get other files don't we? We probably want to trigger > at least some command in that case - either with an argument or by a > different parameter?
To be consistent with archive_command and restore_command I'd rather not do that. The command called can decide by itself what to do by looking at the shape of the argument string. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
