On 2/27/17 00:32, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> To be consistent with archive_command and restore_command I'd rather >> not do that. The command called can decide by itself what to do by >> looking at the shape of the argument string. > Just before the CF begins, I have taken some time to build up a patch > that implements this --end-segment-command, with %f as placeholder.
I think this repeats all the mistakes of archive_command, which ironically pg_receivexlog was intended to fix, such as: shell commands not fully portable, improper fsync support, poor error handling, lack of integration with synchronous replication, inability to handle multiple actions properly. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
