Hi, Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2017, 21:32 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck > <michael.ba...@credativ.de> wrote: > Agreed, and applied as one patch. Except I noticed you also fixed a > couple of entries which were missing the progname in the messages -- I > broke those out to a separate patch instead. Thanks! > Made a small change to "using as much I/O as available" rather than > "as possible", which I think is a better wording, along with the > change of the idle wording I suggested before. (but feel free to point > it out to me if that's wrong). LGTM, I apparently missed your suggestion when I re-read the thread. I am just wondering whether this could/should be back-patched, maybe? It is not a bug fix, of course, but OTOH is rather small and probably helpful to some users on current releases. Michael -- Michael Banck Projektleiter / Senior Berater Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171 Fax: +49 2166 9901-100 Email: michael.ba...@credativ.de credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
