Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Is there an argument for back-patching this?
> I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your
> comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
Yeah, I'd vote for it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
