On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:28:23AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-03-01 10:25:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > We now have a framework for this [1] (currently used by vacuum, but > > extensible). The question is about presentation. I'm fairly sure that > > we shouldn't just add yet another framework, and I doubt that that's > > what's proposed by Peter. > > > > [1] > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c16dc1aca5e > > Majority of that is actually in > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669
If that's even vaguely usable, I'd say we should use it for this. I notice that that commit has no SGML component. Should it have one? Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
