Hi, On 2017-03-10 02:11:18 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > Perhaps instead of adding more clutter to \dvS we could just have a SRF for > now.
I don't see that as clutter, it's useful information, and keeping it discoverable is good, not bad. > At over 2800 rows currently, you're not going to notice one more > addition to \dfS. I think it's hard to design a good SRF for this. Because the fields for different types of progress are different / empty, you can't just trivially return them as rows. You'd have to do some EAV like 'command, field_name1, field_value1, ...' type of thing - not particularly pretty / easy to use. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
