On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Rushabh Lathia > <rushabh.lat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Amit for raising this point. I was not at all aware of > mark/restore. > > I tried to come up with the case, but haven't found such case. > > > > For now here is the patch with comment update. > > Sorry for the delay in getting back to this. This seems to need minor > rebasing again. > > Done. > A few other points: > > ExecEndGatherMerge needs to be patched along the lines of > acf555bc53acb589b5a2827e65d655fa8c9adee0. > > Done. > @@ -2290,7 +2376,6 @@ create_limit_plan(PlannerInfo *root, LimitPath > *best_path, int flags) > return plan; > } > > - > /*********************************************************** > ****************** > * > * BASE-RELATION SCAN METHODS > > Unnecessary. > Fixed. Here is another version of patch with the suggested changes. Thanks, Rushabh Lathia EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
gather-merge-v9.patch
Description: application/download
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers