On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:34 PM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > This thread is stalled and it looks like the patch may not be workable, > at least in the current form. > > I will mark this a "Returned with Feedback" on 2017-03-17 unless there > are arguments to the contrary.
Or even rejected would be fine. I am also not sure if changing the number of tarballs of the fetch mode is worth breaking to get a look earlier at the backup_label file, still the patch as it stands is no good. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
