On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru> wrote: >> And the renaming of pg_clog to pg_xact is also my fault. Attached is >> an updated patch. > > > Thank you. One more question: what about symlinks? If DBA moves, for > example, pg_xact to another dist and leaves the symlink in data directoty. > Suppose, fsync on symlink will do nothing actually.
I did not think of this case, but is that really common? There is even no option to configure that at command level. And surely we cannot support any fancy scenario that people figure out using PGDATA. Existing callers of fsync_fname don't bother about this case as well by the way, take the calls related to pg_logical and pg_repslot. If something should be done in this area, that would be surely in fsync_fname directly to centralize all the calls, and I would think of that as a separate patch, and a separate discussion. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
