On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier >>> Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would think >>> so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it before >>> considering >>> applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from others? >> >> I think so, too. As change from rename() to durable_rename() was applied to >> all releases, maybe we can follow that. In addition, keeping code >> differences as few as possible would make it easier for committers to apply >> other bug fixes to all versions. > > The patch of HEAD applies cleanly on REL9_6_STABLE,
Actually that's not correct as well as pg_clog has been renamed to pg_xact. Let's be careful here. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
