On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:

> On 2017-04-04 00:04:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > >Thank you!
> > > >I already sent version of patch after David's reminder.
> > > >Please find rebased patch in the attachment.
> > >
> > > Cool. I think that's still a bit late for v10?
> > >
> >
> > I don't know.  ISTM, that I addressed all the issues raised by reviewers.
> > Also, this patch is pending since late 2013.  It would be very nice to
> > finally get it in...
>
> To me this hasn't gotten even remotely enough performance evaluation.
>

I'm ready to put my efforts on that.


> And I don't think it's fair to characterize it as pending since 2013,
>

Probably, this duration isn't good characteristic at all.


> given it was essentially "waiting on author" for most of that.
>

What makes you think so?  Do you have some statistics?  Or is it just
random assumption?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Reply via email to