On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-04 00:04:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > >Thank you! > > > >I already sent version of patch after David's reminder. > > > >Please find rebased patch in the attachment. > > > > > > Cool. I think that's still a bit late for v10? > > > > > > > I don't know. ISTM, that I addressed all the issues raised by reviewers. > > Also, this patch is pending since late 2013. It would be very nice to > > finally get it in... > > To me this hasn't gotten even remotely enough performance evaluation. > I'm ready to put my efforts on that. > And I don't think it's fair to characterize it as pending since 2013, > Probably, this duration isn't good characteristic at all. > given it was essentially "waiting on author" for most of that. > What makes you think so? Do you have some statistics? Or is it just random assumption? ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
