On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > To me this hasn't gotten even remotely enough performance evaluation. > And I don't think it's fair to characterize it as pending since 2013, > given it was essentially "waiting on author" for most of that.
This is undeniably a patch which has been kicking around for a lot of time without getting a lot of attention, and if it just keeps getting punted down the road, it's never going to become committable. Alexander's questions upthread about what decisions the committer who took an interest (Heikki) would prefer never really got an answer, for example. I don't deny that there may be some work left to do here, but I think blaming the author for a week's delay when this has been ignored so often for so long is unfair. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
