On 4/10/17 04:27, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > One thing to consider is that we just made the decision that "md5" > actually means "md5 or scram-sha-256". Extrapolating from that, I think > we'll want "scram-sha-256" to mean "scram-sha-256 or scram-sha-256-plus" > (i.e. the channel-bonding variant) in the future. And if we get support > for scram-sha-512, "scram-sha-256" would presumably allow that too.
But how would you choose between scram-sha-256-plus and scram-sha-512? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
