On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <a...@8kdata.com> wrote: > I know this is a lost battle. But please bear with me for a minute.
I admire your courage. > But just a bit more is needed to make it really a big announcement and > provide real value to (I guess, mostly but very interesting) enterprise > customers, for which MITM and impersonating are big things. The good news is > that adding channel binding is like inverse Paretto: a 20% of extra effort > (I bet significantly less) leads to 80% improvement. We'll get that into PG11, don't worry. At least Heikki or I will submit a patch. > So CF v10 is over. So we're on testing phase. Can't we consider this a > "missing feature bug"? ^_^ We should really focus on stability. There is still a bit more to do, and for SCRAM we have added already a lot of infrastructure so this should be improved first. And then we can work on extending it on a sane basis. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
