On 11/04/17 15:18, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 04/11/2017 04:09 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
But I will conserve my remaining courage (thanks Michael!) credits
for future threads ;) I have stated my opinion clearly, I will now go
back to the client library.
Once you're done with the client library, feel free to post a patch to
implement channel binding. If it really is trivial, we can discuss it.
Most likely, it won't go into v10, but someone's got to write the
patch for v11 anyway, and until there's a patch on the table to
discuss, there's no point in arguing. Yes, I'm trying to cajole you
into writing the patch for v11, so that I don't have to :-).
LOL. Do you really want a half-baked Java programmer writing a
patch in C for PostgreSQL? I once tried that and Magnus said my code was
Java code that happened to compile with a C compiler.... ^_^
Having said that, I take the bait, I like challenges and putting my
words behind my code :)
Álvaro
--
Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
-----------
<8K>data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
