On 4/18/17 12:13, Petr Jelinek wrote: > We can definitely easily detect that the bgworker is internal one by > library_name equals 'postgres' so we can easily remove the usesysid and > usename based on that.
I don't see why we need to do that. It is showing the correct information, isn't it? > But that does not solve the issue of identifying > the processes in pg_stat_activity as logical replication laucher/worker. > I wonder if it would be okay to set backend_type to bgw_name for > internal workers and just leave the external ones as it is (or solve > them in v11 with some proper API) as we can control the length of name > there (it will still be longer than the values for other things but > maybe not too much). I think showing bgw_name as backend_type always sounds reasonable. No need to treat external implementations differently. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
