Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think showing bgw_name as backend_type always sounds reasonable. No > need to treat external implementations differently.
That's definitely an approach we could use. It would encourage people to use short bgw_names, which is a constraint that wasn't especially apparent before, but I don't think that's a bad thing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers