At Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:32:48 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote in <CAB7nPqR=jhb2eh0r6bjcexsu_qkdwfyo23coxbt325ahmcs...@mail.gmail.com> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:36 PM, David Rowley > <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > In favour of "location" -> "lsn": Tom, Stephen, David Steel > > In favour of "lsn" -> "location": Peter, Kyotaro > > I vote for "location" -> "lsn". I would expect complains about the > current inconsistency at some point, and the function names have been > already changed for this release..
I won't stick on "location" except that "pg_wal_lsn_diff" seems no longer useful. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
