On 5/1/17 08:10, David Rowley wrote: > On 20 April 2017 at 07:29, Euler Taveira <eu...@timbira.com.br> wrote: >> 2017-04-19 1:32 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I vote for "location" -> "lsn". I would expect complains about the >>> current inconsistency at some point, and the function names have been >>> already changed for this release.. > > OK, so I've created a draft patch which does this.
After reading this patch, I see that a) The scope of the compatibility break is expanded significantly beyond what was already affected by the xlog->wal renaming. b) Generally, things read less nicely and look more complicated. So I still think we'd be better off leaving things the way they are. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
