Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-04-20 16:57:03 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: >> Agreed. I have done some further study by using VMMap tool in Windows >> and it seems to me that all 64-bit processes use address range >> (0000000000010000 ~ 000007FFFFFE0000). I have attached two screen >> shots to show the address range (lower range and upper range). You >> need to refer the lower half of the window in attached screenshots. >> At this stage, I am not completely sure whether we can assume some >> address out of this range to use in MapViewOfFileEx. Let me know your >> thoughts.
> That seems like a fairly restricted range (good!), and squares with > memories of reading about this (can't find the reference anymore). Just > using something like 0x00000F0000000000 as the address might work > sufficiently well. What happens if you just hardcode that in the first > MapViewOfFileEx call, and change RandomizedBaseAddress="FALSE" in > src/tools/msvc/VCBuildProject.pm to true? The material I found about Linux x86_64 addressing explains that the underlying hardware address space is only 48 bits. Linux chooses to normalize this by sign-extending into the upper 16 bits, so that valid 64-bit addresses are 0000000000000000 .. 00007FFFFFFFFFFF and FFFF800000000000 .. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF If I'm counting the bits correctly, Windows is choosing to use only 1/16th of the lower half of the available address space, which seems a bit odd. However, the main point here is that there should be quite a bit of available daylight, if they will let us use addresses above 000007FFFFFE0000 at all. I'd be inclined to do our own low-tech ASLR by using addresses with a random component, say 00000Fxxxxxx0000. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers