On 4/20/17 10:19, Petr Jelinek wrote: > Hmm well since this only affects the synchronization of table > states/names, I guess we could just simply do that before we create the > slot as there is no expectancy of consistency between slot and the table > list snapshot.
I suppose that wouldn't hurt. Prior to the table sync patch, a missing target relation would just show up as an error later on in the logs. So having the error sooner actually seems like a good change. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
