On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 20/04/17 23:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 4/20/17 10:19, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> Hmm well since this only affects the synchronization of table >>> states/names, I guess we could just simply do that before we create the >>> slot as there is no expectancy of consistency between slot and the table >>> list snapshot. >> >> I suppose that wouldn't hurt. >> >> Prior to the table sync patch, a missing target relation would just show >> up as an error later on in the logs. So having the error sooner >> actually seems like a good change. >> > > Very simple patch to make.
+1 for that. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
