On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinn...@iki.fi) wrote: >> I think we should adopt that exact format, so that our verifiers are >> compatible with RFC 5803. It doesn't make any immediate difference, >> but since there is a standard out there, might as well follow it. > > +1 > >> And just in case we get support for looking up SCRAM verifiers from >> an LDAP server in the future, it will come handy as we won't need to >> parse two different formats. > > Agreed.
+1 to all that. Consistency is a good thing. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
