On 2017-04-24 18:14:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2017-04-24 17:33:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> coypu's problem is unrelated: > > > Note I was linking the 9.6 report form coypu, not HEAD. Afaics the 9.6 > > failure is the same as gharial's mode of failure. > > [ looks closer... ] Oh: the 9.6 run occurred first, and the failures on > HEAD and 9.5 are presumably follow-on damage because the stuck postmaster > hasn't released semaphores. > > A bit of googling establishes that NetBSD 5.1 has a broken pselect > implementation: > > http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=43625
Yikes. Do I understand correctly that they effectively just mapped pselect to select? > What I'm inclined to do is to revert the pselect change but not the other, > to see if that fixes these two animals. If it does, we could look into > blacklisting these particular platforms when choosing pselect. Seems sensible. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
