On 2017-04-26 17:05:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Here's an updated version of that, which makes use of our previous > conclusion that F_SETFD/FD_CLOEXEC are available everywhere except > Windows, and fixes some sloppy thinking about the EXEC_BACKEND case. > > I went ahead and changed the call to epoll_create into epoll_create1. > I'm not too concerned about loss of portability there --- it seems > unlikely that many people are still using ten-year-old glibc, and > even less likely that any of them would be interested in running > current Postgres on their stable-unto-death platform. We could add > a configure test for epoll_create1 if you feel one's needed, but > I think it'd just be a waste of cycles.
Yea, I think we can live with that. If we find it's a problem, we can add a configure test later. > I propose to push this into HEAD and 9.6 too. Cool. Change looks good to me. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
