On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:02:46PM +0000, Noah Misch wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:29:29PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 4/30/17 04:05, Noah Misch wrote: > > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter, > > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this > > > open > > > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong > > > as a > > > v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy > > > on > > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar > > > days of > > > this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers > > > may > > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all > > > fixed > > > well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your > > > efforts > > > toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > > > I'm working on this and will report on Friday. > > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due for your status update. Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from you by 2017-05-09 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team ownership without further notice. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
