On 2017-05-08 12:28:38 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 5/8/17 02:58, Noah Misch wrote: > > IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due > > for your status update. Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open > > item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from you by > > 2017-05-09 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team > > ownership without further notice. > > I got side-tracked by the minor releases preparation. I will work on > this now and report on Wednesday.
This first needs discussion, rather than work on a patch. Could you please reply to http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170507234334.yimkp6aq2o43wtt2%40alap3.anarazel.de You've so far not actually replied to the concerns raised in this thread in a more than superficial way, not responded to questions, and it's been two weeks. This is an architectural issue, not just a bug. We can't even think of going to beta before it's resolved. It's understand you not having time to properly resolve it immediately, but we need to be able to have a discussion about where to go from here. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
