On 05/16/2017 08:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> There we go: >> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs > Yup, looks good now. Thanks! > > BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see > that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever > symbols from ICU. I wonder where that came from? A quick grep > suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it > sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name. > >
There is a place in pgindent around line 139 where we filter out typedefs we don't want. You could add it there of you were so inclined. I agree this seems like a remarkably bad choice of name. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
