On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > There we go: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs > > Yup, looks good now. Thanks! > > BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see > that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever > symbols from ICU. I wonder where that came from? A quick grep > suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it > sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name.
OK, I assume we are good to go for Wednesday afternoon, UTC. Thanks for the research. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
