On Wed, 17 May 2017 15:28:24 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
> <i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 May 2017 21:36:11 +0900
> > Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >> On 2017/05/16 21:11, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
> >> > <i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I agree. Maybe this issue should be added to Postgresql Open
> >> >> Items? I think there should be some complex solution that fixes
> >> >> not only triggers for foreign tables at table partitioning, but
> >> >> covers other possible not working cases.
> >>
> >> > I doubt if this is an open item, since DMLs on foreign tables are
> >> > supported since 9.3 and support to add foreign tables to
> >> > inheritance was added back in 9.5.
> >>
> >> I think this issue was introduced by the latter, so that was my
> >> fault.
> >>
> >> One approach I came up with to fix this issue is to rewrite the
> >> targetList entries of an inherited UPDATE/DELETE properly using
> >> rewriteTargetListUD, when generating a plan for each child table in
> >> inheritance_planner. Attached is a WIP patch for that. Maybe I am
> >> missing something, though.
>
> Could this patch include some regression tests to see at what extent
> it has been tested? We surely don't want to see that broken again in
> the future as well. (Nit: I did not look at the patch in details yet)
>
> > I tested the patch, looks good.
>
> What kind of tests did you do?
I tested update triggers for foreign table when regular table is a
parent and foreign table is a child. Case like this:
explain verbose update parent set val = random();
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on public.parent (cost=0.00..258.63 rows=5535 width=10)
Update on public.parent
Update on public.child1
Foreign Update on public.ftable // we have triggers on ftable here
>
> junkfilter = resultRelInfo->ri_junkFilter;
> + tupleid = NULL;
> estate->es_result_relation_info = resultRelInfo;
> Er, what is that?
That fixes the bug when tupleid from regular tuple is used to get
oldtuple for triggers of foreign table.
--
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
