On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > At the very least we'll have to error out. That's still not nice usability > wise, but it sure beats returning flat out wrong values.
I'm not sure. That seems like it might often be worse. Now you need manual intervention before anything even has a hope of working. > I suspect that the proper fix would be to use a different relfilenode after > ddl, when changing the seq file itself (I.e. setval and restart). That seems > like it'd be architecturally more appropriate, but also some work. I can see some advantages to that, but it seems far too late to think about doing that in v10. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
