On 01/06/17 16:51, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Here's a patch doing what I suggested above. The second patch addresses >> an independent oversight where the post alter hook was invoked before >> doing the catalog update. > > 0002 is a slam-dunk. I don't object to 0001 but haven't reviewed it > carefully. >
I did go over the code (ie didn't do actual testing), and I like it much better than the current state. Both in terms of making the behavior more consistent and the fact that the code is simpler. So +1 to go ahead with both patches. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
