On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Yes, I also share this opinion, the shm attach failures are due to
>> randomization behavior, so sleep won't help much.  So, I will change
>> the patch to use 100 retries unless people have other opinions.
>
> Sounds about right to me.
>

Okay.  I have changed the retry count to 100 and modified few comments
in the attached patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: win_shm_retry_reattach_v2.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to