On 02/06/17 22:29, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 02/06/17 08:55, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> On 02/06/17 17:11, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> >>> On 2017-06-02 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >>>> On 31/05/17 21:16, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm seeing a new failure with the patch applied - this time the >>>> history table has missing rows. Petr, I'll put back your access :-) >>> >>> Is this error during 1-minute runs? >>> >>> I'm asking because I've moved back to longer (1-hour) runs (no errors >>> so far), and I'd like to keep track of what the most 'vulnerable' >>> parameters are. >>> >> >> Yeah, still using your test config (with my minor modifications). >> >> When I got the error the 1st time, I did a complete make clean and >> rebuild....but it is still possible I've 'done it wrong' - so >> independent confirmation would be good! > > Well, I've seen this issue as well while I was developing the fix, but > the patch I proposed fixed it for me as well as the original issue. >
While I was testing something for different thread I noticed that I manage transactions incorrectly in this patch. Fixed here, I didn't test it much yet (it takes a while as you know :) ). Not sure if it's related to the issue you've seen though. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Improve-handover-logic-between-sync-and-apply-worker-v2.patch
Description: invalid/octet-stream
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
