On 6/27/17 01:21, Thomas Munro wrote: > Commit ea9df812d8502fff74e7bc37d61bdc7d66d77a7f got rid of > FirstPredicateLockMgrLock, but it's still referred to in a comment in > predicate.c where the locking protocol is documented. I think it's > probably best to use the name of the macro that's usually used to > access the lock array in the code. Please see attached.
Does this apply equally to PredicateLockHashPartitionLock() and PredicateLockHashPartitionLockByIndex()? Should the comment mention or imply both? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
