On 2017-08-30 09:49:14 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > So the question is whether we want {max,min}_wal_size be sized in
> > multiples of segment sizes or as a proper byte size. I'm leaning
> > towards the latter.
>
> Logically in the code it is just a matter of adjusting multipliers.
No code difficulties here, I think we just need to decide what we want.
> Do you think that we should worry about wal segment sizes higher than
> 2GB? Support for int64 GUCs is not here yet.
1GB will be the limit anyway.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
