On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-08-30 09:49:14 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Do you think that we should worry about wal segment sizes higher than >> 2GB? Support for int64 GUCs is not here yet. > > 1GB will be the limit anyway.
Yeah, but imagine that we'd want to raise that even more up. By using bytes, int64 GUCs become mandatory, or we'd come back into using MBs for this parameter, bringing us back to the original implementation. That's something worth thinking about. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
