On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Thank you for the patch. Regarding to creating the backup history file
>>> on stanbys, is there any difference from the patch posted on earlier
>>> thread?
>>
>> That's a rebased version on top of what has been applied, except that
>> I have fixed an incorrect comment and shuffled the code building the
>> WAL segment name for the stop position.
>
> Understood, I'll review this patch.

Here is an updated patch with refreshed documentation, as a result of
449338c which was discussed in thread
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4d951b9-89c0-6bc1-b6ff-d0b2dd5a8...@pgmasters.net.
I am just outlining the fact that a backup history file gets created
on standbys and that it is archived.
-- 
Michael

Attachment: standby-backup-history-v2.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to