Sokolov Yura <funny.fal...@postgrespro.ru> writes: > On 2017-09-06 15:56, Tom Lane wrote: >> The point I'm trying to make is that if tweaking generic.h improves >> performance then it's an indicator of missed cases in the less-generic >> atomics code, and the latter is where our attention should be focused. >> I think basically all of the improvement Sokolov got was from upgrading >> the coverage of generic-gcc.h.
> Not exactly. I've checked, that new version of generic > pg_atomic_fetch_or_u32 > loop also gives improvement. But once you put in the generic-gcc version, that's not reached anymore. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers