On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd think about adjusting the comments the proper way for each AM so > as one can read those comments and catch any limitation immediately. > The fact this has not been pointed out on this thread before any > checks and the many mails exchanged on the matter on this thread make > me think that the current code does not outline the current code > properties appropriately.
Another thing that we could consider as well is adding an assertion in XLogRegisterBuffer & friends so as the combination of REGBUF_STANDARD and REGBUF_NO_IMAGE is forbidden. That's bugging me as well. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
