On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Or we could make upgradecheck a noop, then remove it once all the MSVC > animals have upgraded to a newer version of the buildfarm client which > does not use upgradecheck anymore (I am fine to send a patch or a pull > request to Andrew for that).
This patch is logged as "waiting on author" in the current commit fest, but any new patch will depend on the feedback that any other hacker has to offer based on the set of ideas I have posted upthread. Hence I am yet unsure what is the correct way to move things forward. So, any opinions? Peter or others? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
