"Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes:
> This looks reasonable to me as well. I haven't noticed any issues after
> a couple hours of pgbench with aggressive autovacuum settings, either.
Thanks for looking. As I'm sure you realize, what motivated that was
not liking the switch into AutovacMemCxt that you'd added in
autovacuum_do_vac_analyze ... with this patch, we can drop that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
