On 9/23/17, 12:36 PM, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >"Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes: >> This looks reasonable to me as well. I haven't noticed any issues after >> a couple hours of pgbench with aggressive autovacuum settings, either. > > Thanks for looking. As I'm sure you realize, what motivated that was > not liking the switch into AutovacMemCxt that you'd added in > autovacuum_do_vac_analyze ... with this patch, we can drop that.
Yup. I’ll go ahead and update that patch now. Nathan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
