Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I suggest doing that the other way 'round. Otherwise, the email
>> about the change will inevitably go into a lot of peoples' bit
>> buckets if they haven't adjusted their mail filters yet.
> The argument for doing it after the migration is that the complaints that
> we have received so far have all been from people where email ends up in
> the *inbox* after the migration, not the bitbucket. That's the default
> action in most peoples MUAs when their rules no longer match...
Hm, around here it's no match -> spam bucket. But in any case, why
would you not want to send it before so that it would end up where
they're accustomed to seeing the list's traffic?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
