Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have only been running nightly paralell regression runs since June 27, > so it is possible that the paralell regression was broken in February, > fixed in May, then broken some time after that.
Any further progress on this? My best theory at the moment is that we have a problem with relcache entry creation failing if it's interrupted by an SI inval message at just the right time. I don't much want to grovel through six months worth of changelog entries looking for candidate mistakes, though. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly