I will stand by the fact that I cannot generate failures from
2003-02-15 (200+ runs), and I can from 2003-02-16.  Just to make sure I
didn't screw up the cvs usage, I'll try again tonight if I get the
chance and re-download re-test these two days.

I can set up a script that will step through weekly dates starting from
'now' and see if the 02-16 problem might of been fixed and then
re-introduced if you like.

2003-02-16 fails 6/50
   vacuum failed 1 times
   misc failed 3 times
   sanity_check failed 3 times
   inherit failed 1 times
   triggers failed 4 times

Cheers,
Rob

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:14:32 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something like:

> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have only been running nightly paralell regression runs since June
> > 27, so it is possible that the paralell regression was broken in
> > February, fixed in May, then broken some time after that.
> 
> Any further progress on this?
> 
> My best theory at the moment is that we have a problem with relcache
> entry creation failing if it's interrupted by an SI inval message at
> just the right time.  I don't much want to grovel through six months
> worth of changelog entries looking for candidate mistakes, though.
> 
>                       regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading
> through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that
>       your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 
> 


-- 
 06:57:40 up 10 days, 10:57,  2 users,  load average: 2.17, 2.08, 1.83

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to