Tom Lane writes:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I notice you can use the 'DROP TYPE' syntax to drop a domain. Should that
> > be allowed?
>
> Why not? A domain *is* a type, by any reasonable test.
According to that logic, a view is a table, but we still require DROP VIEW
to drop a view.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
