Strange. I know we check for bison >= 1.875, and you have that, and so do I, but I don't see those regression failures. Is it possible you have old bison output files from an older bison release?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > When I run the regression tests against current sources, I get > failures because bison-generated error messages use "parse > error", not "syntax error". I vaguely recall running into > this issue before I left for the summer -- did we resolve > it? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] neil]$ uname -a > FreeBSD arch.wavefire.com 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #9: Fri Jul 25 12:10:58 > PDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORKSTATION-5.0-SMP i386 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] neil]$ bison --version > bison (GNU Bison) 1.875 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] neil]$ flex --version > flex version 2.5.4 > > regression.diffs is attached. > > -Neil > > P.S. Someone should go ahead and re-generate INSTALL from > the latest SGML: INSTALL still claims that we need bison > 1.50 or greater. > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
